Week 10 - Ecological Urbanism Complete (Posts 1, and 3)
Based on Andrea Branzi’s “Weak Metropolis” an additional idea that may strengethen or resonate well with the suggestions of a New Athen’s Charter is the idea of boundless city. Without perimeter’s or boundaries, the weak metropolis stands strong on its functional un-definition. The air of an uncertain site of a self-reforming society becomes stronger. How can rules or definitions define the metropolis if they don’t exist? Simple, they don’t. The weak metropolis is the dividing line between design and functionality. Say goodbye to intuition, sustainability and purpose.
A final suggestion to the weak metropolis is the stagnant movement. The lifeless green sweep through society. A ramification for faults and contradictions that needs reformation and planning. But, because we are in the present, this will cease to ever happen. The lackluster qualities in our objects is a direct correlation to the lackluster quality of our cities. We cannot move towards the future, if we continue to live in our weak metropolis.
If we though choose to avoid a weak metropolis, and move towards the future, we must educate ourselves. Education will provide society with the know how in order to rise about such a dismal future. The weak metropolis serves no purpose in the drive or function of those that chose to use it. By planning for the future and setting perimeters and goals, we can provide for change, and assessment along the way. I think a successful setting for our future is a mix between the weak metropolis and urban form. A cross between the two may allow for functional definition and coexistence between living, dead, humans and animals. It is necessary though to actively engage in such principles in order to ensure we do not become a weak metropolis of dismal existence.